Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJAY KAROL, NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH, JJ
PUNAM DEVI @ RUPAN DEVI & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court’s confirmation on maintaining conditions for bail. (Para 1 , 3 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. nature of appeal and compliance in enforcement. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. set aside prior high court’s order. (Para 9 , 10) |
O R D E R
2. The appellants challenge the order dated 17.07.2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 46580 of 2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna titled “Punam Devi @
3. On 03.09.2025, this Court passed the following order:-
2. Issue notice, returnable on 17.10.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is permitted to serve the learned standing counsel for the State of Bihar.
affidavit and reply to the interlocutory application(s), if any, before the next date of listing.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the materials available on record.
6. We have noticed the nature of crime and the manner in which it was allegedly committed.
8. If the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/Trial Court feels that the investigation/trial is delayed on account of the appellants’ conduct, it shall be open to the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/Trial Court to take appropriate steps in accordance with the law, including cancellation of bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
