SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9853

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
, CJ, MR. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
USHA GOPIRATHNAM & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
K. R. CHOUDARY & ORS. – Respondent
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 782/2023 in C.A. No. 2741/2009



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv., Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR, Ms. Uditha Chakravarthy, Adv., Mr. Tarun, Adv., Mr. Abhay Singh Yadav, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anuj Tyagi, AOR, Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AOR, Ms. Kanishka Mittal, Adv., Mr. Subodh Kr. Pathak, Adv., Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Adv., Ms. Arunima Chatterjee, Adv.

The court mandates the timely execution of the Conveyance Deed in compliance with earlier judgments and instructions to the registering authorities.

Headnote:The court examined the necessity for the execution of the Conveyance Deed as per the judgment dated 23.09.2022 concerning Civil Appeal No. 2741 of 2009, noting the non-execution was due to the unavailability of certain documents. The court confirmed the area for handover has been identified pursuant to its earlier orders and determined the Registering Authorities must register the Conveyance Deed within two weeks, mandating cooperation from both parties for its execution.

Table of Content
1. court makes directives for the execution of a conveyance deed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court confirms documents must be available for execution. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court orders timely registration of the conveyance deed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. The parties are required to execute the Conveyance Deed in accordance with the judgment dated 23.09.2022 in Civil Appeal No. 2741 of 2009.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that though the respondents have approached the Registering Authorities, i.e., (i) Sub-Registrar, Bidarahalli (ii) The District Registrar, Shivajinagar (iii) The Panchayat Development Officer (PDO), Mandur Panchayath (iv) The Tehsildar, K.R.Puram (v) Bangalore North Assistant Commissioner and (vi) Bangalore Urban Deputy Commissioner, the Conveyance Deed could not be executed on account of the non-availability of certain documents.

3. We see no reason for the Registering Authorities to withhold the execution of the Conveyance Deed, inasmuch the area, which is to be handed over to the petitioners, has been identified by this Court vide its order dated 07.11.2023 in the present proceedings..

4. It is also not in dispute that vide order dated 21.04.2025, this Court noted that the Assistant Director of the Land Records, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru has carried out demarcation as per the order dated 07.11.2023 passed by this Court. Accordingly, this Court directed that on receipt of the report of the Assistant Director of Land Records, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall execute Conveyance Deed in favour of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks.

5. In that view of the matter, we direct the abovestated Registering Authorities to ensure that the Conveyance Deed is duly registered within a period of two weeks from today.

6. The parties shall remain present before the Registering Authorities on 27.10.2025 for execution of the Conveyance Deed.

7. List this matter after two weeks for compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top