The Court affirmed its discretion to dismiss a curative petition where no sufficient case is shown under established legal parameters.

O R D E R

1. Delay in refiling is condoned.

2. Application seeking discharge of the previous Advocate on Record is allowed.

3. Application seeking oral hearing of the Curative Petition is rejected.

4. We have gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents.

5. In our opinion, no case is made out within the Signature Not Verified parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2025.10.18

14:04:20 IST Reason:

Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr.¹. Hence, the Curative Petition is dismissed.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

..................CJI (B.R. GAVAI)

...................J.

(SURYA KANT)

...................J.

(VIKRAM NATH)

NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 07, 2025.

2002 (4) SCC 388 ITEM NO.1001 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) DIARY NO. 40539/2024 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-10-2017 in R.P.(C) No. 2288/2017 in W.P.(C) No. 204/2008 passed by the Supreme Court of India]

N.MANIVANNAN & ORS. PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

(IA No. 299978/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS, IA No. 299977/2024 - DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD, IA No. 201744/2024 - ORAL HEARING)

Date : 07-10-2025 This matter was Circulated today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH By Circulation UPON perusing papers, the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Delay in refiling is condoned.

2. Application seeking discharge of the previous Advocate on Record is allowed.

3. Application seeking oral hearing of the Curative Petition is rejected.

4. The Curative Petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.