SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, CJ, SURYA KANT, J, VIKRAM NATH, J
N.MANIVANNAN & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court condones delay in refiling. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's observations on applications made. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's final ruling on curative petition. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
1. Delay in refiling is condoned.
2. Application seeking discharge of the previous Advocate on Record is allowed.
3. Application seeking oral hearing of the Curative Petition is rejected.
4. We have gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents.
5. In our opinion, no case is made out within the Signature Not Verified parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2025.10.18
14:04:20 IST Reason:
Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr.1. Hence, the Curative Petition is dismissed.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
..................CJI (B.R. GAVAI)
...................J.
(SURYA KANT)
...................J.
(VIKRAM NATH)
NEW DELHI;
OCTOBER 07, 2025.
2002 (4) SCC 388 ITEM NO.1001 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) DIARY NO. 40539/2024 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-10-2017 in R.P.(C) No. 2288/2017 in W.P.(C) No. 204/2008 passed by the Supreme Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.