Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, CJ, SURYA KANT, J, VIKRAM NATH, J
N.MANIVANNAN & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court condones delay in refiling. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's observations on applications made. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's final ruling on curative petition. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
2. Application seeking discharge of the previous Advocate on Record is allowed.
4. We have gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents.
14:04:20 IST Reason:
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
...................J.
...................J.
NEW DELHI;
2002 (4) SCC 388 ITEM NO.1001 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) DIARY NO. 40539/2024 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-10-2017 in R.P.(C) No. 2288/2017 in W.P.(C) No. 204/2008 passed by the Supreme Court of India]
VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
Date : 07-10-2025 This matter was Circulated today.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH By Circulation UPON perusing papers, the Court made the following
1. Delay in refiling is condoned.
3. Application seeking oral hearing of the Curative Petition is rejected.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
