SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9871

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAJESH BINDAL, MANMOHAN, JJ
ABHILASHA DWIVEDI & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK DWIVEDI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Virmani, AOR, Mr. Shubham Pandey, Adv., Mr. Akshaye Ahuja, Adv.

Table of Content
1. transfer of case petitions between courts. (Para 1)
2. court's discretion based on previous rulings. (Para 2)

O R D E R

2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and considering the order passed by this Court in T.P.(C) No.1384/2025 whereby another petition filed by the petitioner no.1 seeking Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by transfer of HMA No.892/2024 was dismissed, we do NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2025.10.18

not find any merit in the present petitions.

4. However, in case video conferencing facilities are available in Court concerned, the petitioners may be permitted to appear through video conferencing on non-effective dates of hearing.

[RAJESH BINDAL]

[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;

VERSUS ASHOK DWIVEDI Respondent(s)

Date : 15-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Rajiv Kumar Virmani, AOR Mr. Shubham Pandey, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :

O R D E R

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top