Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.K. MAHESHWARI, VIJAY BISHNOI, JJ
SHAALINI(DECEASED) & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of fir due to evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's finding justifying quashing of fir. (Para 5 , 6) |
O R D E R
2) Application for deletion of deceased appellant No.1 (Mrs. Shaalini) from the array of parties is allowed.
482 Cr.P.C ., [ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ], the present appeal has been filed.
NIDHI AHUJA Date: 2025.10.18
5) In this view of the matter, the High Court was not justified to refuse the quash the FIR and dismiss the petition by an order impugned.
7) Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
[ J.K. MAHESHWARI ]
[ VIJAY BISHNOI ]
October 16, 2025.
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30.11.2021 in Criminal O.P. No. 7256/2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras]
VERSUS THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Respondent(s)
Date : 16-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
Mr. Amol Chitale, Adv.
Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR Mr. S. Arun Pandi, Adv.
Mr. K. S. Badhrinathan, Adv.
O R D E R
2) Leave granted.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
