SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9873

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAJESH BINDAL, MANMOHAN, JJ
SONAM SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
ARSHIYA BAKSHI (Through her Father) – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sahil Tagotra, Ms. Shreya Kasera, Mr. Rakesh Talukdar, Ms. Sakshi Garg
For the Respondents: Mr. Kunal Chatterji

Table of Content
1. transfer petition seeking relocation of family court proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's decision to dismiss the transfer petition and allow video conferencing. (Para 3)

O R D E R

2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any ground to transfer the present petition.

Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2025.10.18 Reason:

....................J.

....................J.

OCTOBER 13, 2025 ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.15 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition (Criminal) No.675/2025 SONAM SHARMA Petitioner(s)

FOR ADMISSION IA No. 191825/2025 - EX-PARTE STAY Date : 13-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Ms. Shreya Kasera, Adv.

Ms. Sakshi Garg, Adv.

O R D E R

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top