Appeals dismissed due to lack of merit and prior convictions upheld.

O R D E R

1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any error in the judgment of the High Court recording conviction of the appellant.

2. The Criminal Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

....................J.

[RAJESH BINDAL]

....................J.

[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;

Signature Not VerifiedOCTOBER 9TH, 2025 Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2025.10.18 Reason:

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.384/2010 HARNAM SINGH Appellant(S)

Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(S)

O R D E R

1. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that the appellant Harnam Singh has died.

2. Hence, the Criminal Appeal stands abated.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

....................J.

[RAJESH BINDAL]

....................J.

[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 9TH, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL N O . 2400/200 9 RULDU & ANR. Appellant(S)

Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(S)

WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108/2010

O R D E R

1. After hearing learned counsel for the appellants, we do not find any case is made out for entertaining the appeals.

2. The Criminal Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.

3. As the appellants in both the appeals were released on bail by this Court, they are granted six weeks’ time to surrender before the trial Court to undergo the remaining sentence.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

....................J.

[RAJESH BINDAL]

....................J.

[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 9TH, 2025 ITEM NO.122 COURT NO.16 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No.2400/2009 RULDU & ANR. Appellant(s)

VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(s)

WITH Crl.A. No. 2775/2024 (II-B)

IA No. 134976/2025 - GRANT OF BAIL Crl.A. No. 108/2010 (II-B) Crl.A. No. 384/2010 (II-B)

Date : 09-10-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ameet Siingh, Adv.

Mr. Ankit Ambasta, AOR Ms. Ritu Puri, Adv.

Ms. Pushpa Kishore, Adv.

Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj, A.A.G.

Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv.

Mr. Rudra Paliwal, Adv.

Mr. Nikhil Kumar Chaubey, Adv.

Ms. Amisha P. Dash, Adv.

Mr. Vedansh Anand, Adv.

Ms. Damini Garg, Adv.

Ms. Jyotsna Vyas, Adv.

Mr. Yash Tyagi, Adv.

Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR Ms. Drishti Rawal, Adv.

Mr. Mayur Goyal, Adv.

Mr. Sarthak Srivastava, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Criminal Appeal No.2400/2009 And Criminal Appeal No. 108/2010 The appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

As the appellants in both the appeals were released on bail by this Court, they are granted six weeks’ time to surrender before the trial Court to undergo the remaining sentence.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.384/2010 The Criminal Appeal stands abated in terms of the signed order.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2775/2024 The Criminal Appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.