SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAJESH BINDAL, MANMOHAN, JJ
NARINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court upheld prior conviction without errors. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeals dismissed; pending applications disposed. (Para 2 , 3) |
O R D E R
1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any error in the judgment of the High Court recording conviction of the appellant.
2. The Criminal Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
....................J.
[RAJESH BINDAL]
....................J.
[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;
Signature Not VerifiedOCTOBER 9TH, 2025 Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2025.10.18 Reason:
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.384/2010 HARNAM SINGH Appellant(S)
Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(S)
O R D E R
1. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that the appellant Harnam Singh has died.
2. Hence, the Criminal Appeal stands abated.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
....................J.
[RAJESH BINDAL]
....................J.
[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;
OCTOBER 9TH, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL N O . 2400/200 9 RULDU & ANR. Appellant(S)
Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(S)
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108/2010
O R D E R
1. After hearing learned counsel for the appellants, we do not find any c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.