SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAJESH BINDAL, MANMOHAN, JJ
NARINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court upheld prior conviction without errors. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeals dismissed; pending applications disposed. (Para 2 , 3) |
O R D E R
2. The Criminal Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
....................J.
....................J.
Signature Not VerifiedOCTOBER 9TH, 2025 Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2025.10.18 Reason:
Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(S)
1. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that the appellant Harnam Singh has died.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
[RAJESH BINDAL]
[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;
Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(S)
O R D E R
2. The Criminal Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
[RAJESH BINDAL]
[MANMOHAN] NEW DELHI;
VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(s)
IA No. 134976/2025 - GRANT OF BAIL Crl.A. No. 108/2010 (II-B) Crl.A. No. 384/2010 (II-B)
CORAM :
Mr. Ankit Ambasta, AOR Ms. Ritu Puri, Adv.
Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj, A.A.G.
Mr. Rudra Paliwal, Adv.
Ms. Amisha P. Dash, Adv.
Ms. Damini Garg, Adv.
Mr. Yash Tyagi, Adv.
Mr. Mayur Goyal, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Criminal Appeal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.