SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. SUNDRESH, VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, JJ
DHARMINDER KUMAR & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Arvind Gupta, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore, Mr. Surinder Singh, Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Mr. Khowaja Siddqui, Mr. Ravi Bhushan Upadhyay, Mr. Rohini Kumar, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Mr. Umang Shankar, Mr. Sanjay Singh, Mr. Shalender Singh Negi, Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Mrs. Honey Verma, Ms. Goldy Goyal, Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Mr. Narender Kumar Verma, Mr. R. S. Manhas, Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Ms. Preeti Kumari, Mr. Pranav Singh Gautam, Mr. Hardik Giri, Ms. Sarika Chalise, Mr. Sanjay Maurya, Mr. R. C. Kaushik
For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr. Karan Sharma, Ms. Baani Khanna, Mr. Siddhant Sharma

O R D E R

Permission to file SLPs is granted.

The application(a) for exemption from filing official translation is allowed.

Delay condoned.

It is stated that in some matters, notice has been issued.

Issue notice in the remaining matters.

Learned counsel appearing for the State prays for and is granted a period of four weeks to file the counter affidavit.

Rejoinder affidavit, if any, is to be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter.

List the matters thereafter.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top