SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. SUNDRESH, VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, JJ
SUDHA DEVI @ SUDHA VERMA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SEEMA JAISWAL & ANR. – Respondent
Ms. Suruchi Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Yadav, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
We have heard the learned Senior counsel Signature Not Verified appearing for the petitioners and the learned Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2025.10.18
13:03:33 IST counsel appearing for the respondents.
Reason:
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.
However, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners placed reliance on the following paragraph of the show cause filed by the original plaintiff in Execution Case:
“(X) As proposed the new market complex has been completed in all respect and all commercial shops and spaces have been leased out except one shop, which the Def No.-1 kept reserved for the Plaintiffs/D.H.(s) & requested them to occupy the same in furtherance of the agreement to lease entered into by & between both the parties in the shape of the compromise petition but the D.H. No.-2 refused the same due to which it is still vacant causing recurring loss to the J.D., which up till now has accumulated to the time of rupees 10 lakhs for which the Plaintiffs. Dhs are solely liable to compensate.”
Based upon the aforessaid paragraph, it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.