O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has laid challenge to an order dated 29.06.2017 passed by the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, whereby the appeal filed by respondent No.1 has been allowed and the attachment order for the suit property has been set aside.

3. The appellant filed O.S. No.205/2004 before the Trial Court, which was a suit for recovery against respondent No.2. In the said suit, the appellant also filed an application seeking attachment of the property of respondent No.2, situated in Pannaipatti, Munnilaikottai Village, Dindigul Taluk, namely, the subject property. The Trial Court initially directed respondent No.2 to furnish security, which was not furnished. In the meantime, respondent No.2 sold the subject property to respondent No.1 vide sale deed dated 23.09.1999. Resultantly, since respondent No.2 failed to furnish security as directed, the trial court attached the subject property vide order dated 19.07.2000.

4. The aforesaid order came to be challenged by respondent No.1 –

Signattureh Noet Ve rifievd endee befor