SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
PARIHAR MINERAL PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. scope of pil and interim applications in mining cases. (Para 10) |
Signature Not Verified UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Digita lly s ign ed b y O R D E R Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2025.10.18 Reason:
14.07.2025 is reproduced hereunder :-
7. Intervention applications are preferred by owners of the machinery that were seized pursuant to the directions of this Court. It is their contention that they had nothing to do with the mining operations and that they had merely hired the machinery.
9. Counter-affidavit, if any, to IA No. 55 of 2025 and IA No.60 of 2025, be filed in two weeks.
2. In view of above, we request the High Court to take up and disposed of the interlocutory application expeditiously.
4. With these observations, the Special Leave Petition, along with I.A.No.239007/2025 for directions, is disposed of. Delay, if any, is condoned.
(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (NIDHI WASON)
PARIHAR MINERAL PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Petitioner(s)
(IA No. 239007/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Shrivastav, A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.