SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MR. ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
RAM NARESH SINGH & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
JAI BHARAT MANI ACHARYA DIXIT & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court authorized the filing of the application and acknowledged previous orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court concluded by disposing of the application and pending motions. (Para 3) |
1. Permission to file misc. application is granted.
3. While we are not inclined to entertain this misc. application, we direct the Registry of the High Court to bring to the notice of Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court the order passed by this Court on 10.04.2018 for necessary directions.
for impleadment/intervention, are disposed of.
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.6 SECTION III-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No(s). 48877/2025 in C.A. No.
VERSUS JAI BHARAT MANI ACHARYA DIXIT & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 212714/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING PAPER BOOKS IA No. 237074/2025 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT Date : 13-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Adv.
Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Rohilla, Adv.
Ms. Aditi, Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
1. Delay condoned.
3. With these observations, the misc. application is disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.