Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. SUNDRESH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ
GEHNA ANAND – Appellant
Versus
PRADEEP KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's authority to transfer cases under specified statute. (Para 1) |
| 2. completion of service and no appearance from respondent noted. (Para 2) |
| 3. transfer serves the interest of justice. (Para 3) |
| 4. final decisions on transfer and administrative directions. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
2. As per Office Report dated 08.10.2025, service on respondent is complete. However, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Signature Not Verified
12:44:32 IST Reason:
5. It shall be open to the respondent to seek exemption from appearing physically unless it is so warranted by the Trial Court and equally, it shall be open to the petitioner to request for appearance through video conferencing.
…………………………………………………………………J.
…………………………………………………………………J.
NEW DELHI;
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-E S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 340/2025 GEHNA ANAND Petitioner(s)
IA No. 97647/2025 - EX-PARTE STAY Date : 09-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Himmat Singh, Adv.
M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
