SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9903

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANOJ MISRA, UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ
KIRLOSKAR PROPRIETARY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tushar Ajinkya, Adv., Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, AOR, Ms. Sukanya Sehgal, Adv., Ms. Misha Matlani, Adv., Ms. Ritu Choudhary, Adv., Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondents: Dr. A M Singhvi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Hiren Kamod, Adv., Mr. Nishad Nadkarni, Adv., Mr. Nirupam Lodha, Adv., Mr. Ashif Navodia, Adv., Mr. Kshitij Parashar, Adv., Mr. Gautam Wadhwa, Adv., Ms. Jaanvi Chopra, Adv., Mr. Yash Johri, Adv., M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR, Mr. C. Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv.

Table of Content
1. initial injunction requests and modifications. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding trademark rights within a corporate framework. (Para 5 , 7)
3. court's observation on appeal impact. (Para 8)
4. decision to stay modification of injunction. (Para 9)
5. final order regarding ongoing proceedings. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Date : 17-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Tushar Ajinkya, Adv.

Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, AOR Ms. Sukanya Sehgal, Adv.

Ms. Misha Matlani, Adv.

Ms. Ritu Choudhary, Adv.

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :Dr. A M Singhvi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Hiren Kamod, Adv.

Mr. Nishad Nadkarni, Adv.

Mr. Nirupam Lodha, Adv. Mr. Ashif Navodia, Adv.

Mr. Kshitij Parashar, Adv.

Mr. Gautam Wadhwa, Adv. Ms. Jaanvi Chopra, Adv.

Mr. Yash Johri, Adv.

M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Signa ture No t Ve rifi ed Mr. C. Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv.

Digita lly s ign ed b y Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv.

KAVITA PAHUJA Date: 2025.10.18

12:40: 02 IST Mr. Ankit Acharya, AOR Reason:

Mr. Ayush Jain, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top