Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ
SAJJALA SRIDHAR REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's approval for slp and the context of the bail application. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. disapproval of the high court's decision to defer bail hearings. (Para 4 , 6) |
O R D E R
2. Delay condoned.
4. This Court has passed the following order in Diary No.
“ xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx “3. This petition arises from the order passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dated 9-10-2025 below I.A. No.2/2025 filed in Criminal Petition No.10331/2025 by which the High Court while considering the State’s challenge to the grant of regular bail to another co- accused (Accused No.4) in connection with FIR No.21/2024, directed that the Special Judge for Trial of SPE & ACB cases-cum-III Additional District Judge, Vijayawada shall await the decision of the High Court before deciding the bail application preferred by the petitioner – herein including other bail applications filed by the co-accused persons.
5. At the outset, we may state that we are dismayed with the impugned order passed by the High Court. We do not approve of the same.
7. We order that the application filed by the State seeking cancellation of bail granted to Accused No.4 shall be heard on its own merits in accordance with the law
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
