SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9909

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
, CJ, MR. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
SANJAYBHAI CHHIMABHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rajivkumar, AOR, Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Adv., Mr. Shambu Nath Singh, Adv., Mr. Prince Kumar, Adv., Mr. Sandeep Kumar Pathak, Adv.

Table of Content
1. permission to file appeals granted. (Para 1)
2. condonation of delay and service of notice permitted. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

O R D E R

2. Issue notice on the civil appeal(s) as well as on the application seeking condonation of delay.

4. In addition to the usual mode, liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve notice through the Standing Counsel for the respondent(s).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top