SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9910

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANOJ MISRA, UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ
SHIVA KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Dr. Rajesh Pandey, Ms. Ayushi Pandey, Ms. Aswathi M.k.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rishabh Sahu, Mr. Apoorv Shukla, Ms. Prabhleen A. Shukla

Table of Content
1. disputed age of prosecutrix affecting bail opinion. (Para 4)

O R D E R

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

492/2024 has been rejected.

5. The learned counsel for the State- Respondent has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that trial is at an advance stage.

7. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The order passed by the High Court rejecting the regular bail prayer of the appellant is set aside.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

…………………………………………………………………...J [UJJAL BHUYAN]

VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent(s)

Date : 17-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s) :

Ms. Ayushi Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Rishabh Sahu, D.A.G.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

1. Leave granted.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top