SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANOJ MISRA, UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ
SHIVA KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputed age of prosecutrix affecting bail opinion. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
492/2024 has been rejected.
5. The learned counsel for the State- Respondent has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that trial is at an advance stage.
7. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The order passed by the High Court rejecting the regular bail prayer of the appellant is set aside.
9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
…………………………………………………………………...J [UJJAL BHUYAN]
VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent(s)
Date : 17-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s) :
Ms. Ayushi Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Rishabh Sahu, D.A.G.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
1. Leave granted.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.