Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
M/S BPTP LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S YASH CONSTRUCTIONS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel for both sides presented arguments. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reasoning on arbitration and dispute resolution. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal by way of special leave arises out of the judgment and orders passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Arb. No. 253 of 2018 (O&M) on 21.10.2022, whereby the High Court initially allowed the application ex-parte filed by the respondent under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996 (for short, 'the Act') seeking appointment of an arbitrator and subsequently dismissed CM No. 17953-CII of 2022 in ARB No. 253 of 2018 dated 29.03.2023 filed by the appellant for recalling of order dated 21.10.2022.
3. Heard Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, learned counsel for the respondent.
Signature Not Verified
4. Having considered the matter in detail, we are of the opinion Digitally signed by KAPIL TANDON Date: 2025.10.18
10:56:50 IST Reason:
that this has been an unnecessary litigation between the parties.
All that the respondent seeks is determination of the dispute thr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
