Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
M/S BPTP LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S YASH CONSTRUCTIONS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel for both sides presented arguments. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reasoning on arbitration and dispute resolution. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
2. This appeal by way of special leave arises out of the judgment and orders passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Arb. No. 253 of 2018 (O&M) on 21.10.2022, whereby the High Court initially allowed the application ex-parte filed by the respondent under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996 (for short, 'the Act') seeking appointment of an arbitrator and subsequently dismissed CM No. 17953-CII of 2022 in ARB No. 253 of 2018 dated 29.03.2023 filed by the appellant for recalling of order dated 21.10.2022.
Signature Not Verified
10:56:50 IST Reason:
All that the respondent seeks is determination of the dispute through arbitration, for which she filed a petition under Section 11 of the Act way back in the year 2014. This Section 11 proceedings continued till date unabated on an enquiry as to the correct seat/venue for arbitration. In order to ensure that there is finality to this issue, we are of the opinion that the matter can be referred to sole
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
