SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9916

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MANOJ MISRA, UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ
SUNITA MUKESHBHAI PATANI & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 16702/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Aastha Mehta, Mr. Nilay Suchak, Ms. Prerana Mohapatra, Ms. Prina Sharma, Mr. Anshuman Srivastava

Legal interpretation of abetment of suicide regarding harassment allegations under local laws.

Headnote:The petition revolved around the implications of a First Information Report lodged due to allegations related to abetment of suicide against the petitioners, namely, Sunita Mukeshbhai Patani and others. The court considered the actions taken under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, emphasizing that withdrawal of earlier legal challenges does not bar ongoing investigations. Key issues included whether the petitioners' conduct amounted to abetment of suicide, focusing on local law's interpretation regarding harassment. The court mandated interim protective measures for the petitioners during the ongoing investigation while determining to issue further notices.

Table of Content
1. assessment of allegations related to suicide abetment. (Para 1)

O R D E R

1. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the deceased was husband of petitioner No. 1. Petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by are mother, father and brother of the CHETAN ARORA Date: 2025.10.18 Reason:

petitioner No. 1.

2. The deceased committed suicide. As a result, a First Information Report came to be lodged in the year 2017 implicating the petitioners. The petitioners challenged the First Information Report through application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973. Initially, there was an interim order passed in the said petition. However, later, the said petition was withdrawn vide order dated 22.08.2025. Therefore, now the investigating agency is seeking to arrest the petitioner. It has been submitted that the allegations made against the petitioners are regarding harassment of the deceased which, according to petitioners, would not amount to abetment of suicide.

3. Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.

4. In the meantime, it is provided that in the event the Petitioners are arrested in connection with FIR No. 200/2017, P.S. Bapu Nagar, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, they shall be released on taking personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- subject to their undertaking that they shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating agency. They shall also submit an undertaking that they will not threaten the witnesses or tamper the evidence.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top