SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9917

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. MANOJ MISRA, MR. UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ
S. KRISHNA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 16324/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Darpan Km, Ms. Amrita Sharma, Mr. Rajat Jonathan Shaw, Mr. Durgha Prakash, Ms. Easha Chandhok, Ms. Rashi Bansal

Court recognized the implausibility of allegations regarding currency replacement, granting conditional release.

Headnote:The court evaluated allegations against the petitioner regarding currency note replacement to misappropriate funds amounting to Rs. 6,74,047. It concluded that such allegations were difficult to accept as they lacked plausibility. The court framed the issue of false implication and granted conditional release pending investigation. The final outcome provided for the petitioner's release on bond with specific conditions.

JUDGMENT

Date : 17-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Darpan Km, Adv.

Ms. Amrita Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rajat Jonathan Shaw, Adv.

Mr. Durgha Prakash, Adv. Ms. Easha Chandhok, Adv.

Ms. Rashi Bansal, AOR For Respondent(s) :

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Signa ture No t Ve rifi ed O R D E R Digitally signed by CHETAN ARORA Date: 2025.10.18 Reason:

1. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that allegations against the petitioner are in respect of replacing higher denomination foreign currency notes with lower denomination currency notes to misappropriate an amount of Rs. 6,74,047. It is submitted that such allegations, on the face of it, appear difficult to accept as how would one be able to replace same number of foreign currency notes with lower denomination currency notes.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated; he is prepared to co-operate with the investigation.

3. Issue notice, returnable in six weeks. 4. In the meantime, it is provided that in the event the Petitioner is arrested in connection with FIR No. 15/2025, P.S. Tirumala Town, Tirupati, he shall be released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- subject to an undertaking that he shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating agency.

He shall also submit an undertaking that he will not threaten the witnesses or tamper the evidence.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top