SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
, CJ, MR. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
M/S P.K. NAIDU AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grievance about a government demand. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the court confirms arbitration for disputes. (Para 5) |
| 3. outcome allows government actions post-tender. (Para 6) |
IA No. 53865/2024 - DOCUMENT TAKEN ON RECORD IA No. 171403/2025 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 26667/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES Date : 13-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Lenin Raj K, Adv.
Mr. C. George Thomas, AOR For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
Ms. Bina Gupta, Adv.
Signature Not Verified Mr. Mridu J. Mukherjee, Adv.
Reason:
O R D E R
2. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the basic grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the following observations made by the learned Single Judge:
3. He submits that on the basis of the aforesaid observations of the Division Bench of the High Court, the respondent No. 1 has issued a Demand Notice dated 22.12.2020. He submits that in the said demand notice, a huge amount is demanded without their being any basis for m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.