Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
DEEPAK CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND COOPERATIVE ELECTION TRIBUNAL & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim orders appeal context (Para 1) |
| 2. notice and interim order confirmations (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. contention left open and procedural justice (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. final disposal and application conclusions (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
2. While issuing notice on 07.04.2025, this Court granted interim order staying the operation of the impugned order. The said interim order is still in operation.
4. Having considered the matter in detail and in view of the fact that election notification was issued on 25.01.2025, which is after the amendment dated 12.12.2024, we are of the opinion that interest of justice would be subserved if we confirm our interim order dated 07.04.2025 and request the High Court to decide the main writ petition expeditiously. Ordered accordingly. We further clarify that our order will not restrict the Election Commission in exercising its statutory duty.
6. With these observations, the Special Leave Petition stands disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
