Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
DEEPAK CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND COOPERATIVE ELECTION TRIBUNAL & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim orders appeal context (Para 1) |
| 2. notice and interim order confirmations (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. contention left open and procedural justice (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. final disposal and application conclusions (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
1. This Special Leave Petition has been filed against an interim order dated 27-02-2025 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Special Appeal No. 16/2025.
2. While issuing notice on 07.04.2025, this Court granted interim order staying the operation of the impugned order. The said interim order is still in operation.
3. Heard Mr. Devadatt Kamat, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, learned senior counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 and Ms. Nidhi Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2.
4. Having considered the matter in detail and in view of the fact that election notification was issued on 25.01.2025, which is after the amendment dated 12.12.2024, we are of the opinion that interest of justice would be subserved if we confirm our interim order dated 07.04.2025 and request the High Court to decide the main writ petition expeditiously. Ordered accordingly. We further clarify tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
