SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
SANJAY PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA SINGH & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in proceedings condoned. (Para 1) |
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
Signa2ture. Not VerifiedFollowing the order passed in similar circumstances in SLP (C)
Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2025.10.18
11:02:N16 oIST. 13990 of 2024 dated 12.07.2024, we direct as under :-
Reason:
a) Since no order prejudicial to the interest of the respondent(s) is being passed, the requirement of notice to the respondent(s) is waived.
b) These petitions arise out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, vide which it has been observed that by the next date of the listing of the Contempt Petition, Respondent No. 3 (present petitioner) should either file compliance affidavit or place the final order in special appeal preferred by the State.
c) Ms. Ruchira Goel, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, states that though various attempts have been made by the petitioner herein for moving the Division Bench to consider the application filed on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh for stay of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court but on account of the huge pendency, the application filed by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.