SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9922

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ
SANJAY PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA SINGH & ANR. – Respondent
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 41499/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Ruchira Goel, AOR, Mr. Sharanya, Adv., Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv., Ms. Sthavi Asthana, Adv.

Court defers contempt proceedings pending state application decision, waiving notice as no adverse order is issued.

Headnote:The judgment discusses the procedural issues surrounding the filing of contempt proceedings. The court finds that as no order prejudicial to the respondent(s) is being passed, notice to the respondent(s) is waived and defers contempt proceedings until the stay application by the State is decided, directing expeditious handling of the matter within three months. The petitions are disposed of accordingly.

Table of Content
1. delay in proceedings condoned. (Para 1)

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

Signa2ture. Not VerifiedFollowing the order passed in similar circumstances in SLP (C)

Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2025.10.18

11:02:N16 oIST. 13990 of 2024 dated 12.07.2024, we direct as under :-

Reason:

a) Since no order prejudicial to the interest of the respondent(s) is being passed, the requirement of notice to the respondent(s) is waived.

b) These petitions arise out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, vide which it has been observed that by the next date of the listing of the Contempt Petition, Respondent No. 3 (present petitioner) should either file compliance affidavit or place the final order in special appeal preferred by the State.

c) Ms. Ruchira Goel, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, states that though various attempts have been made by the petitioner herein for moving the Division Bench to consider the application filed on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh for stay of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court but on account of the huge pendency, the application filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh is not being considered by the Division Bench of the High Court.

d) As it is not in the hands of the petitioner herein to get the matter before the Division Bench listed and taken up, we are, therefore, of the considered view that the contempt proceedings be deferred till the application filed by the State for stay of the order passed by the learned Single Judge is decided either way.

e) We also request the learned Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad to consider the application for stay filed by the State in accordance with law, on its own merit, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from today.

f) As already observed hereinabove, till the application for stay of the order passed by the learned Single Judge is decided either way, the contempt proceedings shall remain deferred.

g) The special leave petitions are, accordingly, disposed of.

h) Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (NIDHI WASON)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top