SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SURYA KANT, JOYMALYA BAGCHI, JJ
STATE OF U.P. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
RATNESH SAXENA & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. substantial compliance with court orders. (Para 1) |
O R D E R
1. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned senior counsel appearing for the Signature Not Verified Digitaplly seignted biytioners, very fairly submits that the orders passed by the NITIN TALREJA Date: 2025.10.18
10:11:03 IST Reason:
learned Single Judge and the Division Bench in the instant case have been substantially complied with, except that the interest component has not been paid. In this regard, he refers to paragraph 7 of the order of the learned Single Judge dated 19.09.2023, whereunder 8% interest has been awarded on the arrears of retiral benefits. It is urged that if there is an inordinate delay on the part of the retiree in approaching the Court, the High Court ought not grant interest at least for the period during which no action was taken by the aggrieved retiree.
2. We have considered the submissions. In view of the fact that most of the retiral benefits have been paid to respondent No.1, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The petitioners may therefore release the interest amount in favour of respondent No.1 within a period of four weeks. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to rai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.