SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH, JJ
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS – Appellant
Versus
M/S JAIN RECYCLING PVT. LTD. – Respondent
O R D E R
On perusal of Office Report dated 19.09.2025, we find that there are the following defects in the review petitions:
“1. Advocate has not mentioned the filed on and drawn on dates in the application.
2. Advocate has not mentioned the averment under Order XLVII Rule 5.”
The defects were notified to the learned counsel by letter dated 31.07.2025 but the same have not been cured so far.
There is a delay of 337 days and 334 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NEETU SACHDEVAdays respectively in filing these Review Date: 2025.10.18
10:06:14 IST Reason:
Petitions which has not been satisfactorily Contd..
explained.
Even otherwise, having carefully gone through the Review Petitions, the order(s) under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, we are satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record or any merit in the Review Petitions, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned.
Accordingly, the Review Petitions are dismissed both on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
…………………………………………………….,J.
( B.V. NAGARATHNA )
…………………………………………………………,J.
( NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH )
NEW DELHI;
OCTOBER 07, 2025 ITEM NO.1005 S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.