SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9933

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SURYA KANT, JOYMALYA BAGCHI, JJ
GUNJAN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 | SLP (CIVIL) NO. 14809 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Samdarshi Sanjay, Monika Sharma, Ashish Kumar Sharma
For the Respondents: Anubhav Kumar, Anirudh Alex Victor, Gauri Swarup Bansal, Manoj Swarup And Co., Shaurya Sahay, Divyanshu Sahay, Aman Jaiswal, Palak Mathur, Tanmaya Agarwal, Wrick Chatterjee, Aditi Agarwal, Rachit Mittal, Anup Kumar, Parish Mishra, Kanishk Raj, Adarsh Srivastava, Abhishek Sinha

The court validated the mutual settlement agreement as integral to the case outcome, facilitating land access and construction rights.

Headnote:The appeal pertains to a judgment by the High Court dismissing the appellant's writ petition against an administrative order. The court acknowledges the mutual settlement agreement reached by the parties which affects access and rights related to land and construction. The appeal garners a partial allowance reflecting the settlement's terms as pivotal to the resolution.

Table of Content
1. judgment against administrative order and mutual settlement. (Para 2 , 3)
2. terms of mutual settlement regarding land and access. (Para 4)

O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.01.2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, dismissing the appellant’s writ petition, where he had challenged an order dated 09.07.2024 passed by the Commissioner, Saharanpur Division. This Court vide order dated 27.05.2025 directed the parties to maintain status quo re: further construction at the disputed site. The official as well as the private respondents entered appearance and have filed their respective counter-affidavits.

3. Now, a joint application (IA No.196944/2025) has been filed by the parties to place on record the mutual settlement agreement entered into between them.

4. The agreement dated 14.08.2025 (Annexure 1) unveil that M/s. Dwarika Balaji Consortium has agreed to provide the appellant a shared passage of 4.5 meters along with extra land of 18.39 square Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NITINm TAeLREtJAers on the northern side of the plot. This has been agreed to as Date: 2025.10.18

09:37:25 IST Reason:

per the proposal dated 01.08.2025.

5. M/s. Dwarika Balaji Consortium has agreed to grant the appellant and the occupants of his plot or any visitors/family members free and unrestricted access through the main entrance and the proposed shared passage of 4.5 meters on the northern side of his plot. The above-named consortium has further agreed to provide the said shared passage within six weeks from today. The undertaking is taken on record.

6. It is also agreed that the consortium will execute a registered sale deed in favour of the appellant of the additional land admeasuring 18.39 square meters as per the proposal dated 01.08.2025. However, the consortium shall have the right to lay water, electricity and sewage pipelines on the proposed shared passage, as and when required.

7. In case the appellant seeks approval of building plans for his plot in question from Muzaffarnagar Development Authority (MDA) or any other statutory authority, the above-named consortium will not raise any objection in respect thereto. The parties have further undertaken to withdraw and not to initiate any civil/criminal proceedings against each other.

8. In view of the mutual settlement agreement dated 14.08.2025, the instant appeal is allowed in part; the impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside, and the writ petition filed by the appellant is disposed of, strictly in terms of the settlement agreement dated 14.08.2025. The said agreement shall be read as a part of this order, and the parties shall abide by all the terms and conditions contained therein, including those which have not been expressly referred to above in this order. Resultantly, all interim order(s) stand vacated.

..........................J.

(SURYA KANT)

..........................J.

(JOYMALYA BAGCHI)

NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 14, 2025 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14809/2025 [Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 31-01-2025 in WRITC No. 34555/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

GUNJAN GUPTA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 196944/2025 - DOCUMENT TAKEN ON RECORD, IA No. 205029/2025 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION, IA No. 174100/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 130677/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 178143/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 175007/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 186561/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No. 174105/2025 -

PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date : 14-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top