SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9944

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
JYOTI PRAVEEN KHANDPASOLE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 989/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Gaurav Kumar Bansal, Adv., Mr. Vishnu Kumar Gupta, Adv., Ms. Nandita Bansal, Adv., Mr. Aathrva Upadhaya, Adv., Ms. Chandrika Upadhaya, Adv., Ms. Rani Mishra, AOR
For the Respondents: Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, AOR, Ms. Yashmita Pandey, Adv.

Court emphasizes mandatory victim compensation directions by Special Courts to improve disbursement effectiveness.

Headnote:The court orders notice to the respondents and notes a significant failure in the legal framework regarding victim compensation as necessitated by the absence of specific directions from Special Courts/Session Courts. The court emphasizes the need for such directions to facilitate compensation disbursement. The court directs a copy of this order to be dispatched to all High Court Registrar Generals for communication to appropriate district judges and training institutions, ensuring awareness on victim compensation under sections of the CrPC and relevant laws.

ORDER

Issue notice to the respondents. However, service of notice on respondent No.1/Union of India is dispensed with for the present.

Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, learned counsel, who is present in the Court, accepts notice for respondent no.2.

We find that one of the impediments in disbursement of victim compensation to the victims is the absence of a direction being issued by the Special Courts/Session Courts to pay compensation to the victims of a crime. Consequently, the victims have to seek such compensation on their own, either by making an application to the State Legal Services Authority or by any other means known to law. There is also an absence of awareness in this regard.

In the circumstances, we direct that the concerned Special Court/Session Courts ought to pass appropriate directions with regard to payment of victim compensation in appropriate cases, so that the implementation of the said directions of the concerned Special Court/Session Courts could be easily made by the State Legal Services Authority through the District Legal Services Authority or the Taluk Legal Services Authority, as the case may be.

Hence, a copy of this order shall be dispatched by the Registry of this Court to the Registrar Generals of all the High Courts for onward transmission to Principal District Judges for communication to the concerned Special Courts.

Further, the Registrar Generals of all the High Courts shall communicate this order to the Directors of all the State Judicial Academies for onward communication to all Principal District Judges that the Special Courts/Session Courts and also to impress upon concerned Special Court Judges with regard to the aspect of payment of victim compensation during the course of their training in the State Judicial Academies in accordance with Section 357A of the CrPC, corresponding to Section 396 of the BNSS and POCSO Act and Rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top