SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
JYOTI PRAVEEN KHANDPASOLE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER
Issue notice to the respondents. However, service of notice on respondent No.1/Union of India is dispensed with for the present.
Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, learned counsel, who is present in the Court, accepts notice for respondent no.2.
We find that one of the impediments in disbursement of victim compensation to the victims is the absence of a direction being issued by the Special Courts/Session Courts to pay compensation to the victims of a crime. Consequently, the victims have to seek such compensation on their own, either by making an application to the State Legal Services Authority or by any other means known to law. There is also an absence of awareness in this regard.
In the circumstances, we direct that the concerned Special Court/Session Courts ought to pass appropriate directions with regard to payment of victim compensation in appropriate cases, so that the implementation of the said directions of the concerned Special Court/Session Courts could be easily made by the State Legal Services Authority through the District Legal Services Authority or the Taluk Legal Services Authority, as the case may be.
Hence, a copy of this order shall be dispatched by the Reg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.