SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9946

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ
MOHAMMED RASAL.C & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA & ANR. – Respondent
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 6588/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. K. Rajeev, Mr. Shinoj K.narayanan, Ms. Niveditha R Menon, Mr. Aditya Verma, Mr. Tarun Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. V. Giri, Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Mr. Renjith B. Marar, Mr. A. Karthik, Ms. Smrithi Suresh, Ms. Bagavathy Vennimalai, Ms. Veera Mahuli, Mr. V. Chitambaresh, Mr. Karthik S.D.

The Court determined that further examination by a three-judge bench is necessary.

Headnote:This judgment concerns the petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 6588/2025 arising from a final judgment and order dated 11-03-2025 passed by the High Court of Kerala. The Court determined that the matter requires further examination by a Three-Judge Bench. It was stated that this case would be listed as soon as the Three-Judge Bench is constituted. The primary legal question framed was whether the circumstances necessitate a bench of three judges for hearing.

ORDER

This matter requires to be heard by a Three- Judge Bench combination.

As and when the Three-Judge Bench is constituted, the matter may be listed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon