MOHAMMED RASAL.C & ANR. vs STATE OF KERALA & ANR.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9946

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ
MOHAMMED RASAL.C & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA & ANR. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. K. Rajeev, Mr. Shinoj K.narayanan, Ms. Niveditha R Menon, Mr. Aditya Verma, Mr. Tarun Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. V. Giri, Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Mr. Renjith B. Marar, Mr. A. Karthik, Ms. Smrithi Suresh, Ms. Bagavathy Vennimalai, Ms. Veera Mahuli, Mr. V. Chitambaresh, Mr. Karthik S.D.

ORDER

This matter requires to be heard by a Three- Judge Bench combination.

As and when the Three-Judge Bench is constituted, the matter may be listed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 9946

SUPREME COURT OF INDIAVIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJMOHAMMED RASAL.C & ANR. – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR. – Respondent

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ
MOHAMMED RASAL.C & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA & ANR. – Respondent