Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DALVEER BHANDARI, DIPAK MISRA, JJ
A. SHANMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
ARIYA KSHATRIYA RAJAKULA VAMSATHU MADALAYA NANDHAVANA PARIPALANAI SANGAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of property disputes (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. trial court's findings on possession and adverse possession (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. judicial observations on delays in administration of justice (Para 18 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. importance of truth and careful pleading (Para 24 , 26 , 27 , 39) |
| 5. principles guiding judicial decisions (Para 42) |
| 6. final orders on the appeals (Para 43) |
JUDGMENT
Delay condoned.
3. These two appeals arise out of cross suits filed before the High Court of Judicature at Madras in S.A. No. 1973 of 2002 and S.A. No. 869 of 2009 dated April 20, 2011. In both these appeals, A. Shanmugam is the appellant and Ariya Kshatriya Raja Kulavamsa Madalaya Nandhavana Paripalana Sangam is the respondent which for convenience hereinafter is referred to as the ‘Society’.
5. According to the appellant, in the year 1994, the respondent-Society claiming to be the owner of the suit property tried to dispossess the appellant by force necessitating the appellant to file a suit in O.S. No.1143 of 1994 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai praying for issuance of permanent injunction against the respondent-Society. The said suit was,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
