SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10315

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. Pardiwala, K.V. Viswanathan, JJ
S.Rajaseekaran – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No.295/2012



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Krishna Kumar, AOR, Mr. Vinodh Kanna B, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikramjit Bannerjee, A.S.G., Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR

The Court emphasized the need for a deterrent mechanism in traffic laws to prevent abatement of trials under the Motor Vehicles Act, urging reforms for timely assistance to road accident victims.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 162(1) - Requirement for insurance companies to provide cashless treatment for road accident victims and to reimburse post-discharge medical expenses - Amendment to UP Act No. 4 of 2023 raising concerns over abatement of trials for offences under MV Act - Recommendation for Justice A.M. Sapre Committee to review reliefs proposed in interim applications - Affidavit required from UP Government regarding section-wise justifications for abatement of proceedings creating concerns regarding deterrence against traffic offences. (Paras 1-26)

(B) Justification of abatement of proceedings for certain traffic violations raises questions on deterrence and legality - Court emphasizes the need for compliance with existing traffic laws and protocols for immediate assistance to road accident victims. (Paras 1-23)

(C) Swift Response Protocols recommended for ensuring timely response during accidents - Emphasis on public awareness and community engagement for accident reporting. (Paras 11-12)

Facts of the case:
The case involves interim applications regarding necessary interventions by the Union of India and the State regarding the Motor Vehicles Act, particularly focusing on immediate assistance to road accident victims and the implications of recent amendments in Uttar Pradesh law affecting ongoing trials.

Findings of Court:
The Court requests a comprehensive review of reliefs proposed in the interim applications, particularly the constitutional challenges raised against the recent amendments and the need for effective implementation of protocols to aid accident victims.

Issues: The main issues include the impact of UP Act No. 4 of 2023 on ongoing trials for motor vehicle offences, adequacy of immediate response to road accidents, and potential deterrent effects of current amendments.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court found that current amendments to the Uttar Pradesh statute might undermine the enforcement of traffic laws and the deterrence necessary to ensure safety on roads, calling for justifications and effective measures from state authorities to uphold these critical legal provisions.

Result: Interim applications directed for further consideration and required reports submitted within specified timelines.

Table of Content
1. court proceedings initiation and applications for direction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. request for expert committee review of traffic laws. (Para 4 , 9 , 10)
3. court's analysis on implications of traffic law amendments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20)
4. need for legal deterrence in traffic regulation. (Para 14 , 17 , 21)
5. mandate for compliance reports on traffic law enforcement. (Para 26 , 28)

ORDER

1. There are four Interim Applications today before us.

2. In I.A. No. 43387 of 2025, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“(i) to direct the Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, to make a scheme under Section 162 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (as amended) (the MV Act) requiring insurance companies to provide cashless treatment for road accident victims in hospitals who are entitle to benefits under the Motor Vehicle Insurance Cover and also to reimburse post-discharge medical expenses, time-to-time, within 2 weeks of submitting invoices and supporting documents for timely financial support and uninterrupted medical care for accident victims post discharge.

as this Hon’ble Court has directed to the Union of India for making a scheme only under S. 162(2) of the MV Act for golden hours vide order dt. 08.01.2025 passed in IA No. 202442 of 2023 in WP (C) No. 295 of 2012 (Annexure A-4 at pg. 58 to 67)

(ii) to direct the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) to ensure that all general insurance companies comply with the schemes made under Section 162 (1) of the MV Act by providing complete coverage for the cashless treatment of road accident victims (in hospital and post hospital) in as much as per electronic-Detailed Accident Reports (e-DAR), nearly 60% of road accidents involve motor vehicles having third party coverage (Annexure A-5 at pg. 68 to 70);

(iii) to direct the Union of India, through the Secretary, MoRTH, to ensure that the scheme under Section 162 (1) of the MV Act includes clear guidelines, funding mechanisms, and accountability measures for effective implementation.

(iv)To direct the Union of India through its Secretary MoRTH that upon the commencement of the treatment scheme under S.162(1) of the MV Act for road accident victims, a comprehensive awareness campaign should be diligently executed through both print and electronic media to ensure that eligible individuals, their family members, and associates are well-informed about the existence and benefits of the scheme, enabling them to effectively utilize this vital resource for their well-being;

(v) To direct the Union of India through its Secretary MoRTH to make the pertinent information regarding medical treatment for victims of road accidents as per the Scheme under S. 162(1) of the MV Act accessible to the public and to release monthly/bimonthly bulletins regarding district-wise and state wise number of beneficiaries of the Scheme along with the amount incurred for the treatment of the road accident victims. Such transparency will enable an assessment of the scheme's benefits to the victims.

(vi)and/or pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

3. We heard the applicant appearing in person & Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, the learned Amicus Curiae. We also heard, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, the learned ASG appearing for the Union.

4. We are of the view that all the relevant aspects highlighted in the I.As. more particularly the reliefs prayed for, should be looked into by the Hon’ble Justice A.M. Sapre Committee constituted by this Court.

5. We request the Committee to deliberate on all these reliefs, which have been prayed for, and forward its suggestions. The suggestions that may be offered by the Committee would definitely come handy to us before we proceed to issue final directions.

6. The Registry shall forward one copy of this order to the Committee of Hon’ble Justice A.M. Sapre at the earliest.

7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top