Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. Pardiwala, K.V. Viswanathan, JJ
S.Rajaseekaran – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court proceedings initiation and applications for direction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. request for expert committee review of traffic laws. (Para 4 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis on implications of traffic law amendments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. need for legal deterrence in traffic regulation. (Para 14 , 17 , 21) |
| 5. mandate for compliance reports on traffic law enforcement. (Para 26 , 28) |
ORDER
1. There are four Interim Applications today before us.
2. In I.A. No. 43387 of 2025, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“(i) to direct the Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, to make a scheme under Section 162 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (as amended) (the MV Act) requiring insurance companies to provide cashless treatment for road accident victims in hospitals who are entitle to benefits under the Motor Vehicle Insurance Cover and also to reimburse post-discharge medical expenses, time-to-time, within 2 weeks of submitting invoices and supporting documents for timely financial support and uninterrupted medical care for accident victims post discharge.
as this Hon’ble Court has directed to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
