SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10436

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ANGURI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-016483 - 2025



REVISED ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 16483/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-09-2025 in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 482 BNSS No. 7468/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

ANGURI DEVI & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s)

IA No. 262855/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

IA No. 262859/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES Date : 16-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH For Petitioner(s) :Ms. Payoshi Roy, Adv.

Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Adv.

Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha, Adv.

Mr. Bharathimohan M., Adv.

Ms. V. Swetha, Adv.

Mr. Vairawan A.s, AOR For Respondent(s) :Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Yadav, Adv.

Ms. Anjale Kumari, Adv.

Mr. Amit Upreti, Adv.

Mr. Taiyyab Khan Salamani, Adv.

Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Petitioners lay challenge to the order dated 12-09- 2025 in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application under Section

482 BNSS No.7468/2025 titled “Anguri Devi & ors. Vs. State Of Signature Not VerifiedU.P.” passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.

Digitally signed by Date: 2025.10.27 Reason:

not inclined to entertain this Special Leave Petition.

Contd..

2. The special leave petition is dismissed.

3. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file an application for grant of regular bail positively within two weeks before the concerned Trial Court.

4. As and when such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law without being influenced by the dismissal of this petition.

5. Till the consideration of the bail application by the concerned Trial Court by passing appropriate order, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners.

6. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.

ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 16483/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-09-2025 in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 482 BNSS No. 7468/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

ANGURI DEVI & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s)

IA No. 262855/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

IA No. 262859/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES Date : 16-10-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH For Petitioner(s) :Ms. Payoshi Roy, Adv.

Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Adv.

Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha, Adv.

Mr. Bharathimohan M., Adv.

Ms. V. Swetha, Adv.

Mr. Vairawan A.s, AOR For Respondent(s) :Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Yadav, Adv.

Ms. Anjale Kumari, Adv.

Mr. Amit Upreti, Adv.

Mr. Taiyyab Khan Salamani, Adv.

Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Petitioners lay challenge to the order dated 12-09- 2025 in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application under Section

482 BNSS No.7468/2025 titled “Anguri Devi & ors. Vs. State Of U.P.” passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, we are not inclined to entertain this Special Leave Petition.

Contd..

2. The special leave petition is dismissed.

3. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file an application for grant of regular bail before the concerned Trial Court.

4. As and when such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law without being influenced by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top