IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION(CIVIL) NO(S). 699 OF 2025 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).7958 OF 2024 PUSHPALATA S. SHARMA ALIAS ... PETITIONER(S)

PUSHPA S. SHARMA Versus AJAY SHARMA & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

1. The only apprehension expressed by the petitioner, is that the respondents in their undertaking have not specifically averred that no damage would be caused to the premises in question.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Signature Not Verifiedopposite parties, upon instructions, states that Digitally signed by SONIA BHASIN Date: 2025.10.16 Reason:

because of oversight this fact could not be incorporated. However, she has a revised undertaking and would be filing today in the Registry of this Court.

3. Hence, we are not proceeding any further in this contempt petition.

4. Accordingly, contempt petition, is disposed of.

5. Pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of.

.....................J.

(VIKRAM NATH)

....................J.

(SANDEEP MEHTA )

NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 15, 2025.

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 699/2025 in C.A. No. 7958/2024 PUSHPALATA S. SHARMA ALIAS PUSHPA S. SHARMA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS AJAY SHARMA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 15-10-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Adv.

Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv.

Mr. Shreyash Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sidharth Nair, Adv. Mr. Harshit Singh, Adv.

Mr. Yashwant Sanjenbam, Adv.

M/S. K J John And Co, AOR For Respondent(s) : Ms. Tanya Aggarwal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The contempt petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SONIA BHASIN) (RANJANA SHAILEY)

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR