Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, MR. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
RADHA YADAV – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing on railway safety matters. (Para 1) |
| 2. court emphasizes safety concerns and insurance disparities. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. further proceedings scheduled. (Para 8) |
ORDER
2. Report has been submitted by the appellant-Railways, in which certain issues have been flagged.
4. Having gone through the report, we are of the considered opinion that, at the initial stage, the focus should be on the safety of the tracks and the railway crossings, from which other aspects would emerge. As an indication has been given with regard to what the Railways proposes to undertake, no definite timelines have been provided. We, therefore, require the learned ASG to file a better affidavit, focusing, for the present, on the two issues highlighted at items no. 3 and 7 of the said report.
6. With regard to the remaining issues, let the Railways continue carrying out its overall plan for the improvement of the system in its entirety.
8. As prayed for by the learned ASG, the matters be listed on 13.01.2026, retaining their position.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
