SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10579

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, MR. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
RADHA YADAV – Respondent
Miscellaneous Application No.741-742/2019 in C.A.No.1265-1266/2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G., Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Sr. Adv., Mrs. Bharti Tyagi, Adv., Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ayush Anand, Adv., Mr. Rajeshwari Shankar, Adv., Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s):Mr. Shikhil Suri, Sr. Advocate, Amicus Curiae, Mr. Vikas Singh Jangra, Advocate

The Court prioritizes passenger safety and equitable insurance provisions for all ticket purchasing methods by the Railways.

Headnote:The Supreme Court analyzed safety concerns within the Railways indicating priorities for safety of tracks and crossings. The Court emphasized the need for a focused affidavit on these issues, alongside addressing insurance disparities for ticket purchases. The scheduling of further proceedings was established for 13.01.2026.

Table of Content
1. hearing on railway safety matters. (Para 1)
2. court emphasizes safety concerns and insurance disparities. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. further proceedings scheduled. (Para 8)

ORDER

Heard Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General(ASG) appearing for the appellant-Railways and Mr. Shikhil SuTri, learned Amicus Curiae

2. Report has been submitted by the appellant-Railways, in which certain issues have been flagged.

3. Mr. Banerjee, learned ASG submits that these issues may not be taken as the priorities of the Railways and are only for the purposes of highlighting the aspects on which the Railways has taken a conscious decision as far as safety issues concerning the system and passengers are concerned.

4. Having gone through the report, we are of the considered opinion that, at the initial stage, the focus should be on the safety of the tracks and the railway crossings, from which other aspects would emerge. As an indication has been given with regard to what the Railways proposes to undertake, no definite timelines have been provided. We, therefore, require the learned ASG to file a better affidavit, focusing, for the present, on the two issues highlighted at items no. 3 and 7 of the said report.

5. In addition, the learned Amicus has pointed out that an insurance cover is provided to passengers purchasing tickets online to cover accidents, which is not available to those who purchase tickets offline. Mr. Banerjee is required to take instructions as to the reason for this distinction between the two modes of procurement of tickets.

6. With regard to the remaining issues, let the Railways continue carrying out its overall plan for the improvement of the system in its entirety.

7. However, for the present, we require the Railways to respond and file further affidavit/report with regard to the two issues, as indicated above, and also respond with regard to the insurance issue.

8. As prayed for by the learned ASG, the matters be listed on 13.01.2026, retaining their position.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top