SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10584

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. DIPANKAR DATTA, MR. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ
RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No.132/2016 | CONMT.PET.(C) No. 591/2022 in W.P.(C) No. 132/2016 | CONMT.PET.(C) No. 856/2023 in W.P.(C) No. 132/2016 | W.P.(C) No.876/2017 | W.P.(C) No. 1099/2023 | SLP(C) No.16838/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Anwesha Saha, AOR, Mr. Jaswant Singh Rawat, AOR, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR, Mr. Aditya Ranjan, AOR, Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR, Mr. Ashutosh Yadav, AOR, Mr. Gautam Das, AOR, Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR, Mrs. N. Kavitha Ramashewar, Adv., Mr. A. Rajarajan, Adv., M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR
For the Respondents: Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, AOR, Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR, Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR, Mr. Krishna Murari, Adv., Mr. Satya Mitra, AOR, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR, Mr. V. Chithambaresh, Sr. Adv., Mrs. Taruna Singh Gohil, AOR

The court clarified that the Teacher’s Eligibility Test (TET) is a mandatory qualification for Special Educators, addressing earlier misunderstandings regarding the Rehabilitation Council of India's requirements.

Headnote:(A) Teacher's Eligibility Test (TET) - Minimum educational qualification for Educators - Court acknowledges that TET is recognized as the essential qualification for educators from Pre-school to Primary Stage, contrasting earlier assumptions regarding Rehabilitation Council of India (RCI) requirements - NCTE to clarify current statutory rules on TET for Special Educators. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Mandatory qualification and notification process - Issues arising as states commence selection processes without specifying TET as requisite qualification, necessitating directive for compliance. (Paras 4-6)

Facts of the case:
The court considers earlier judgments and current notifications regarding the recruitment of Special Educators where confusion exists about mandatory qualifications, specifically if TET should be included as a qualification.

Findings of Court:
The court requires NCTE to provide clarity on the necessity of TET as a qualification and mandates no appointments be made without it during selection processes.

Issues: The main issues relate to the publicized requirements for becoming a Special Educator and whether selection processes are being conducted according to current qualifications.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's reasoning underscores the need for strict adherence to established educational qualifications and transparency in recruitment processes to ensure applicants are adequately informed of necessary credentials.

Result: Notice issued; cases to be re-listed on December 2, 2025.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - TET is recognized as the essential qualification for educators from Pre-school to Primary Stage (!) . - Earlier assumptions regarding RCI requirements were incorrect (!) . - Some States issued notifications for selection processes without specifying TET as a requisite qualification (!) . - NCTE must clarify the necessity of TET for Special Educators (!) . - NCTE is mandated as an additional respondent in the matter (!) . - No candidate shall be appointed unless they possess the TET qualification (!) . - Re-list on 02nd December, 2025 (!) . - Cases relating to West Bengal and Odisha to be heard on the next date (!) .

What is the mandatory qualification for Special Educators from Pre-school to Primary Stage?

What are the requirements for states commencing selection processes for Special Educators?

What clarification does NCTE need to provide regarding TET for Special Educators?


Table of Content
1. tet is the minimum qualification for educators. (Para 1)
2. comparison of qualification requirements for special educators. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court's inquiry into tet qualification necessity. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9)
4. assurance of publication of merit lists by the delhi government. (Para 10 , 11)
5. next hearing scheduled for further consideration. (Para 12 , 13)

ORDER

1. Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh, has invited our attention to the judgment of this Court in Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. v. Union of India, (2021) 17 SCC 1 and has sought to impress upon us that Teacher’s Eligibility Test, TET, to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines framed by the National Council for Teacher Education, has been acknowledged as the minimum educational qualification for becoming an Educator for Classes Pre- school-V (Pre School to Primary Stage).

2. This is absolutely contrary to the impression that we were carrying till date. We were under the impression that in terms of the order dated 07th March, 2025 passed by a coordinate bench of this Court, any candidate or person aspiring to be appointed as a Special Educator was mandatorily required to obtain the Rehabilitation Council of India, RCI quali

3. However, Mr. Rishi Malhotra, learned amicus curiae has also drawn our attention to an earlier order of this Court dated 21st July, 2022 where circular dated 10th June, 2022 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Education, Department of School Education and Literacy has been referred to. It also, inter alia, refers to CTET/TET/NTA score + demonstration of Class room teaching + interview, as part of the recruitment process.

4. It is not in dispute that proceeding on the basis that RCI is the mandatory qualification, some of the States have issued notification commencing selection processes without, however, mentioning that TET is also a requisite qualification.

5. We need to ascertain from the National Council for Teacher Education, NCTE the position of statutory rules/guidelines, as they stand today, with regard to the necessity to clear TET by persons seeking to become Special Educators; if yes, whether wide publication of such necessity has been given or not.

6. NCTE be impleaded as an additional respondent in the lead matter.

7. Issue notice, returnable on 02nd December, 2025.

8. Learned amicus curiae shall place before us a complete set of the notifications issued by various States initiating selection process without specifying TET as a requisite qualification.

9. If any selection process is on the verge of completion, we make it clear that no candidate shall be appointed unless he/she possesses the TET qualification.

10. Ms. Kunika, learned counsel appearing for the impleader(s) makes a complaint that despite the earlier order dated 28th October, 2025, Delhi Government has not published results of selection pursuant to the advertisements dated 20th July, 2022 and 31st July, 2023. Ms. Neha Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Delhi Government, on instructions, assures the Court that the merit list will be published within two weeks from date.

11. We require the list to be placed before this Court on the next date.

12. Re-list on 02nd December, 2025 at 03:00 p.m.

13. Due to paucity of time, the cases relating to the States of West Bengal, Odisha could not be taken up today. We propose to hear the said States on the next date.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top