SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10585

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. DIPANKAR DATTA, MR. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ
RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No.132/2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Anwesha Saha, AOR, Mr. Jaswant Singh Rawat, AOR, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR, Mr. Aditya Ranjan, AOR, Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR, Mr. Ashutosh Yadav, AOR, Ms. Deeplaxmi Subhash Matwankar, AOR, Mr. Gautam Das, AOR, Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR
For the Respondents: Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, AOR, Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR, Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR, Mr. Krishna Murari, Adv, Mr. Satya Mitra, AOR, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR

The TET is mandated as a minimum qualification for educators, emphasizing adherence to regulatory standards in recruitment processes for educational institutions.

Headnote:(A) The Education Act - Teacher's Eligibility Test (TET) as a minimum qualification for educators mandated by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) and concerns over notifications issued by various States for educator recruitment without TET requirement - (Paragraphs 1-2)

(B) Legal Necessity - The court emphasizes ensuring adherence to qualification standards set by governing bodies and the need for transparent selection processes - (Paragraphs 4, 9)

(C) Court's directive - Formation of clarity over statutory guidelines regarding TET qualifications and immediate measures to correct recruitment processes - (Paragraphs 5-9)

(D) Evidence of compliance - Directions to produce notifications from States regarding selection processes; assurance from the Delhi Government regarding merit list publication - (Paragraphs 10-12)

Findings of Court:
There exist discrepancies in recruitment protocols concerning TET qualifications necessitating regulatory clarity.

Issues: The legality of state notifications pertaining to educator selection processes and the necessity of TET qualifications as statutory requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court rules on the necessity of maintaining statutory qualification standards in educational recruitment, thereby ensuring legality and fairness in the selection processes.

Result: Notice issued returnable on 02nd December, 2025.

ORDER

1. Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh, has invited our attention to the judgment of this Court in Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. v. Union of India, (2021) 17 SCC 1 and has sought to impress upon us that Teacher’s Eligibility Test, TET to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines framed by the National Council for Teacher Education, has been acknowledged as the minimum educational qualification for becoming an Educator for Classes Pre- school-V (Pre School to Primary Stage).

2. This is absolutely contrary to the impression that we were carrying till date. We were under the impression that in terms of the order dated 07th March, 2025 passed by a coordinate bench of this Court, any candidate or person aspiring to be appointed as a Special Educator was mandatorily required to obtain the Rehabilitation Council of India, RCI quali

3. However, Mr. Rishi Malhotra, learned amicus curiae has also drawn our attention to an earlier order of this Court dated 21st July, 2022 where circular dated 10th June, 2022 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Education, Department of School Education and Literacy has been referred to. It also, inter alia, refers to CTET/TET/NTA score + demonstration of Class room teaching + interview, as part of the recruitment process.

4. It is not in dispute that proceeding on the basis that RCI is the mandatory qualification, some of the States have issued notification commencing selection processes without, however, mentioning that TET is also a requisite qualification.

5. We need to ascertain from the National Council for Teacher Education, NCTE the position of statutory rules/guidelines, as they stand today, with regard to the necessity to clear TET by persons seeking to become Special Educators; if yes, whether wide publication of such necessity has been given or not.

6. NCTE be impleaded as an additional respondent in the lead matter.

7. Issue notice, returnable on 02nd December, 2025.

8. Learned amicus curiae shall place before us a complete set of the notifications issued by various States initiating selection process without specifying TET as a requisite qualification.

9. If any selection process is on the verge of completion, we make it clear that no candidate shall be appointed unless he/she possesses the TET qualification.

10. Ms. Kunika, learned counsel appearing for the impleader(s) makes a complaint that despite the earlier order dated 28th October, 2025, Delhi Government has not published results of selection pursuant to the advertisements dated 20th July, 2022 and 31st July, 2023. Ms. Neha Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Delhi Government, on instructions, assures the Court that the merit list will be published within two weeks from date.

11. We require the list to be placed before this Court on the next date.

12. Re-list on 02nd December, 2025 at 03:00 p.m.

13. Due to paucity of time, the cases relating to the States of West Bengal, Odisha could not be taken up today. We propose to hear the said States on the next date.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top