SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Online)(SC) 15

SUPREME COURT
N/A, J
State of U.P. and Others v. Dr. Ramesh Prasad
C. A. No. 2559 of 1996



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N/A
For the Respondents: N/A

University teachers' retirement age is governed by specific statutes, distinct from state-maintained institutions, establishing a compulsory retirement age of 58.

Headnote:The Supreme Court examined the legality of the High Court's order which allowed a teacher to remain in service until 60 years, contrary to U.P. State University Act provisions. The Court determined that university teachers must adhere to prescribed superannuation laws, while teachers in state-maintained colleges are governed by different rules. It concluded that the respondent was not entitled to employment beyond the age of 58 without specific government approval. The appeal was thus allowed, overturning the High Court's order.

Table of Content
1. notice served on respondent assumed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. definition of university teacher under the act. (Para 3 , 4)
3. regulations on retirement of government servants. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. comparison of employment rules for university vs state teachers. (Para 8)
5. final ruling on the illegality of the high court's order. (Para 9)

1 Leave granted.

2. Though notice was sent to the respondent on September 10, 1993 in usual course, till date the report of the service of notice has not been sent nor the acknowledgment received. Under these circumstances, the notice must be deemed to have been served on the respondent.

3. The only controversy in this case is whether the respondent teacher imparting teaching in Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Agra is entitled to remain in service till he attains the age of superannuation of 60 years. Making such a claim, the respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court. The High Court even without considering the relevant provisions had directed the State Government in the impugned order dated December 21, 1990 in CMWP No. 33277/90 to continue the respondent in service till he attains the age of superannuation of 60 years virtually allowing the writ petition. Calling this order in question, the above appeal by special leave has been filed. We have directed the learned counsel to place before us the relevant Rules. S.2 (18) of the U. P. State University Act, 1973 (for short, 'the Act') defines the teacher. The Section reads thus :
"2 (18). 'teacher'. means a person employed for imparting instruction or guiding or conducting research in the University or in an Institute or in a constituent affiliated or associated college and includes a Principal or Director."

4. University Teacher has been defined in S.2 (19) of the Act which reads as under :
"2 (19) 'teacher of the University' means a teacher employed by the University for imparting instruction and guiding or conducting research either in the University on in an Institute or in constituent college maintained by the University."

5. By exercising the power under S.49 (d) of the Act, the State Government had framed the statutes and Statute 16.24 prescribes superannuation of 60 years for the teachers of the University. Under Statue 17.01, it is stated that the provisions of the Chapter shall not apply to teachers of any college exclusively maintained by the State Government or Local Authority.

6. Under Regulation 459 of U. P. Civil Services Regulations, the date of compulsory retirement of a Government servant (in other words superannuation) is such as may from time to time be prescribed thereof in the Financial Hand Book, Vol. II. In Fundamental R.56 (a) contained in the U. P. Financial Handbook, Vol. II to IV, it is provided thus :
"56 (a). Except as otherwise provided in other clauses of this rule, the date of compulsory retirement of a Government servant, other than a Government servant in inferior services, is the date on which he attains the age of 58 years. He may be retained in service after the date of compulsory retirement with the sanction of the Government on public grounds, which must not be retained after the age of 60 years except in very special circumstances."

7. Regulation 520 of the U. P. Civil Services Regulations also envisages that an officer who is in receipt of a superannuation or rearing pension shall not be reemployed or continue to be employed in service paid from general revenues or from a local fund, except on public grounds. Extension or reemployment on extension of the terms of employment may be given under the circumstances enumerated thereunder, which read as under :
(i) By the Government of India in the Administrative Department concerned, when the pensioner served before retirement of a Gazetted appointment directly under the Government of India or belonged to an Imperial Service or Imperial Branch of any Service, or was an officer, who before retirement, has a post usually filled by officers of an Imperial Ser




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top