SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Online)(SC) 20

SUPREME COURT
K. Ramaswamy, G. B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Electronics Trade and Technology Develp. Corpn. Ltd. v. Indian Technologists and Engineers (Electronic) Pvt. Ltd.


1 Leave granted.

2 We have heard the counsel on both sides.

3 The appellant laid the complaints under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, 'the Act') for dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of the funds in the accounts of the accused. The complaint of the appellant read thus :
"The above cheque was presented by the complainant on 28-1-1990, through their Bankers M/s. Hyderabad Bank, Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad for realisation, with the promise by the accused, that the same will be honoured when presented. However, the said cheque was dishonoured with the Banker's endorsement dated 29-11-1990. "1, referred to drawer, 2. instructions for stopping payment and 3. stamped exceeds arrangements". It is evident from the Banker's memo dated 29-11-1990 that the said cheque was dishonoured by the Bank for wants of funds only.
On receipt of the intimation dated 29-11-1990 from the Bank, the complainant has issued a notice on 6-12-1990 to the accused by Registered Post Acknowledgment Due, informing him that the cheque dated 30-6-1990 was dishonoured by their bankers and demanded payment within 15 days from the date of receipt of the said notice. The said notice was rec











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top