Back
SUPREME COURT
B. P. Jeevan Reddy, J, S. B. Majmudar, J, A. M. Ahmadi, CJ, Kuldip Singh, J, S. Saghir Ahmad, J, Sujata V. Manohar, J
Union of India v. Agro Engineering (MP) Pvt. Ltd. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court reiterated the need for compliance with the central investment subsidy scheme. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. summary of the dispute regarding subsidy applications and their eligibility. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on factual issues raised regarding applicant qualifications. (Para 6) |
| 4. extensions granted for application processing by the committee. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final ruling and directions for further examination of applications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. There are three orders passed by this Court: in Union of India v. Aarbee Pipe & Profiles, SLP (C) No. of 1996 CC 293, decided on February 1, 1996 dated 1-2-1996 by a Bench of three Judges; Umasha Textile v. Union of India , Civil Appeals Nos. 6240-82 of 1994, 7602 of 1994, SLP (C) No.... (CC No. 28211), SLPs (C) Nos. 331, 12605 of 1995, C.As. Nos. 7346-48 of 1995, SLP(C) No. 9400 of 1995, decided on December 5, 1995 [printed at p. 765] dated 5-12-1995 by a Bench of two Judges and State of M.P. v. Agro Engineering (MP) (P) Ltd, Civil Appeal No.... of 1995, decided on November 1, 1995 [printed at p. 763] dated 1-11-1995 by a Bench of two Judges. The substratum of the di
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
