SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Online)(SC) 35

SUPREME COURT
A.M. Khanwilkar, J
Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay v. M/s. Mafatlal Gangabhai and Co. (P) Ltd.
Civil Appeal No. 5946 of 1994 | Civil Appeal No. 2215 of 1978



Cash payments made by an assessee to employees do not qualify as perquisites and hence are not subject to restrictions in deductible expenditure.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act - Section 40(a)(v) and Section 40A(5) - Cash payments to employees - Court interprets that cash payments made by an assessee to employees do not fall within the ambit of restrictions on deductible expenditure for perquisites, as they do not constitute 'expenditure' that provides a benefit or amenity to employees. (Paras 11, 14)

(B) Legal Principles - Deduction limitations - The provisions aim to restrict excess deductions taken by assessees on extra benefits provided to higher paid employees. The court differentiated between direct payments as salary versus benefits and amenities. (Paras 4, 10)

Facts of the case:
The appeals relate to the interpretation of cash payments concerning allowances provided to employees, with conflicting views from different High Courts regarding their classification as perquisites and deductibility under the Income Tax Act.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that cash payments made directly to employees do not qualify as 'expenditure' under the provisions aimed at restricting perquisites, aligning with the interpretation upheld by several High Courts.

Issues: The primary question addressed was whether cash payments to employees should be classified as perquisites under the Income Tax Act provisions, leading to a conflict of opinions among High Courts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that cash payments do not fall within subsection provisions limiting deductible perquisites, thereby affirming that such payments are to be treated separately as salary.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the legal provisions regarding deductibility of employee benefits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. detailed examination of section 40a and restrictions on deductible expenditure. (Para 3 , 4)
3. clarification that cash payments to employees do not constitute perquisites or deductible expenses. (Para 5 , 14)
4. facts surrounding the appeals, including specific cash payments made by the assessee. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. judicial reasoning on cash payments and their qualification under tax law. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

1 Leave granted in the Special Leave Petition.

2. The only question in this batch of appeal is whether the payments made in cash by an assessee to its employees are within the mischief of S.40(a) (v) and S.40A(5). Sub clause(v) was inserted in clause (a) of S.40 by the Finance Act, 1986 with effect from April 1, 1969. S.40 (a) (v) reads as follows :
"S 40. Amounts not deductible. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in (S.30 to 38), the following amounts shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession",
(a) in the case of any assessee-
(v) any expenditure which results directly or indirectly in the provision of any benefit or amenity or perquisite, whether convertible into money or not, to any employee (including any sum paid by the assessee in respect of any obligation which but for such payment would have been payable by such employee) or any expenditure or allowance in respect of any assets of the assessee used by such employee either wholly or partly for his own purposes or benefit, to the extent such expenditure or allowance exceeds one fifth of the amount of salary payable to the employee, or an amount calculated at the rate of one thousand rupees for each month or part thereof comprised in the period of his employment during the previous year, whichever is less :
Provided that in computing the aforesaid expenditure or allowance the following shall not be taken into account, namely:-
(a) any payment by way of gratuity:
(b) the value of any travel concession or assistance referred to in clause (5) of S.10;
(c) passage moneys or the value of any free or concessional passage referred to in sub clause (i) of clause (6) of S.10;
(d) any payment of tax referred to in sub clause (vii) or sub clause (vii a) of clause(6) of S.10;
(e) any payment of tax referred to in sub clause (vii) of clause(1) of S.17;
(f) any sum referred to in sub clause (v) of clause (2) of S.17:
(g) the amount of any compensation referred to in sub clause (i) or any payment referred to in sub clause (ii) of clause (3) of S.17;
(h) any sum referred to in sub clause (iv) or clause (v) of sub-section (1) of S.36;and
(i) any expenditure referred to in clause (ix) of sub-section (1) of S.36;
Provided further that nothing in this sub clause shall apply to any expenditure which results directly or indirectly in the provision of any benefit or amenity or perquisite to an employee whose income chargeable under the head "Salaries" is seven thousand five hundred rupees or less.
Explanation 1- The Provisions of this sub clause shall apply notwithstanding that any amount not to be allowed under this sub clause is included in the total income of the employee.
Explanation 2. - In this sub clause, the word 'salary' shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause(h) of R.2 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule."













3. Sub clause (v) of S.40(a) was omitted by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1971, which simultaneously introduced sub-section(5) in S.40A. Sub-section (5) of S.40A omitting unnecessary clauses, reads thus;
"S. 40 A. Expenses or payments not deductible in certain circumstances :-
(1) The provision of this Section shall have effect not withstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other provision of this Act relating to the computation of income under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession:-
(5) (a) Where the assessee-
(i) incurs any expenditure which results directly or indirectly in the p



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top