SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Online)(SC) 86

SUPREME COURT
*S. P. Bharucha, V. N. Khare, JJ.
assessee – Appellant
Versus
Revenue – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against customs tribunal ruling. (Para 1 , 4 , 12)
2. excise duty demands and their timelines. (Para 3 , 6 , 8)
3. jurisdiction concerns regarding allegations. (Para 9 , 15)
4. board's order timeline analysis. (Para 10 , 11)
5. final ruling on appeals. (Para 16 , 17)

1. The assessee is in appeal against an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal.

2. We set out the facts only insofar as they relate to the three issues which are canvassed at the Bar.

3. The assessee, a cigarette manufacturing company, was issued a show cause notice on 26th August, 1983 in respect of its Bombay factory. A demand for excise duty in the sum of Rs. 28.93 crores was raised for the period 1978 to 1983. On 19th April, 1984 a second show cause notice was issued to the assessee. It was in respect of its Baroda factory. It related to period 1978 to 1983 and demanded Rs. 35.32 crores by way of excise duty. On 2nd September, 1985 a third show cause notice was issued to the assessee which related to its Bombay and Baroda factories. It sought to make the assessee and two of its job workers liable to excise duty in the sum of Rs. 13.37 crores for the period 1st July, 19
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top