SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(SC) 16

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Mr. J. R. Mishra, J
Union of India and Another v. Hansoli Devi and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. N. N. Goswami
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. re-determination of compensation must follow land acquisition notification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. reliance on prior case law to contest the high court's ruling. (Para 4)
3. final determination of limitation period for re-determination applications. (Para 5)

1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Writ Petition No. 241 of 1992 dated 4-1-1992, whereunder the High Court while disposing of the writ petition filed by the respondent claimants directed re - determination of the compensation payable to the claimants in this case in the light of S.28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

2. The award in this case came to be passed on 20-10-1972 and the request for reference under S.18 came to be rejected on the ground that it was not made within time, as early as on 28-4-1975. With the introduction of S.28A by the amending Act of 1984 with effect from 24-9-1984 and the decision of the High Court in RFA No. 166 of 1977 on 5-9-1986 enhancing the compensation at the instance of other claimants, compensation at the enhanced rates was claimed by the present clai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top