SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Online)(SC) 23

SUPREME COURT
S.C. Agrawal, P.K. Bahri, JJ
Onkar Lal Bajaj and Others v. Union of India and Others
T. C. (C) No. 80 of 2002



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Kirit Rawal, Solicitor General

Executive cancellation of allotments must adhere to Article 14 principles, ensuring fair play and individual case evaluations, rather than uniform actions based on controversy.

Headnote:(A) Government of India Order, 9 August 2002 - Cancellation of allotments - The Court examined whether the decision to cancel 3760 allotments by the Ministry of Petroleum had the necessary factual basis or justified public interest as a response to raised controversies (Paras 1, 8, 23, 44).

(B) Public Interest - The Court held that the en masse cancellation lacked examination of individual cases and was arbitrary, violating the principles of fair play and equality under Article 14 of the Constitution (Paras 22, 45).

(C) Executive Power - The decision was criticized for being an arbitrary exercise of power without justifiable grounds (Paras 24, 43).

(D) Judicial Review - The Court emphasized that governmental actions must not be arbitrary and require legitimate rationale, otherwise they can be quashed by the judiciary (Paras 54, 58).

Facts of the case:
The Ministry of Petroleum, under political pressure due to allegations, cancelled all allotments since 1 January 2000, affecting numerous dealers and raising concerns about arbitrary governance (Paras 9, 10).

Findings of Court:
The en masse cancellation was ruled as unjustified and arbitrary due to lack of proper consideration of individual applications, resulting in the quashing of the order (Paras 58, 60).

Issues: The legality of the cancellation order based on fairness, application of mind, and potential political motivations (Paras 20, 35).

Ratio Decidendi: The Court determined that the decision lacked thorough review and consideration of the consequences, thus it was arbitrary and devoid of fair play; also emphasizing that public interest cannot override principles of justice and equity (Paras 22, 43).

Result: The order dated 9 August 2002 is quashed except for the cases referred to the Committee for further examination (Paras 58, 62).

1The marketing of petroleum products has been quite a lucrative business. The four public sector oil companies - Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPC), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPC) and IBP Company Limited (IBP) control the marketing of the said products. We are concerned with the marketing of petrol and diesel, Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO), Light Diesel Oil (LDO) and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG). The challenge in these matters is to the validity of the order of the Government of India dated 9th August, 2002 whereby all allotments made with respect to retail outlets, LPG distributorships and SKO - LDO dealerships on the recommendations of the Dealer Selection Boards (DSBs) since 1st January, 2000 were decided to be cancelled.

2 In past also allotments of retail outlets for petroleum products were cancelled by this Court after coming to the conclusion that the allotments made were arbitrary, on account of political connections / motivation and extraneous considerations. The tainted allotments were also cancelled by various orders of High Court of Delhi. The allotments which were on merits and not tainted were not ordered to be cancelled. It is a matter of coincidence that exactly seven years ago i.e. in August, 1995 on the front page of Indian Express a news item appeared regarding the grant of retail outlets for petrol pumps on account of political and other connections. Now, in August 2002, i.e. exactly seven years later again news item appeared on the front page of same newspaper about allotments to the near and dear ones of political functionaries attributing the same on account of political considerations. In Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India and Others , 1996 (6) SCC 530 , this Court observed that for these allotments, a transparent and objective criteria / procedure has to be evolved based on reason, fair play and non arbitrariness.

3 Always, many have been in race for getting these dealerships / distributors. From September, 1977, a uniform procedure for selection of persons for appointment as dealers / distributors applicable to all the public sector oil marketing companies was introduced by the Government. The dealers were earlier selected from amongst the applicants by a selection committee comprising senior officials of the oil companies. The applications were invited from interested persons by advertising the available dealerships in the newspapers.

4 In the year 1983, the Central Government constituted two member Oil Selection Boards comprising of a retired High Court Judge as Chairman and a retired Civil Servant as a member. In the year 1990, one prominent member of public importance was also included in the said boards. In January 1993, the composition of the Oil Selection Board was - a retired High Court Judge as Chairman and a representative of Scheduled Castes / Scheduled Tribes / Other Weaker sections and a prominent public figure as members. The name of the board was later changed to 'Dealer Selection Board'. The guidelines were updated and notified in October 2000 by Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas in terms of Office Memorandum dated 9th October, 2000. According to these guidelines, the DSBs have the following composition.
"i) A retired judge of a High Court / retired District Judge / retired Additional District Judge / retired Officer who had held an Equivalent judicial post -- Chairman
ii) An Officer of the concerned Oil Company not below the rank of Deputy General Manager or Chief Manager depending on Availability -- Member
iii) An officer of another Oil Company not below the rank of Deputy General manager or Chief Manager depending on availability -- Member"



5 The guidelines provide detailed procedure for selecting candidates for appointment as dealers / distributors. A total of 59 DSBs were constituted in June - July 2000 and afterwards. These DSBs were entrusted the task of selections for the retail outlets, LPG distribut


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top