SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Online)(SC) 29

SUPREME COURT
S. N. Variava, Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, S. H. Kapadia, JJ.
Commissioner of Customs & Excise Bangalore v. Sujata Textile Mills Ltd.


1 Application for amendment of cause title in Civil Appeal No. 4686 of 2004 is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2 All these appeals raise a common question and therefore are being disposed of by this common order. Under S.4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excises and Salt Act , 1994, the value is not to include the amount of duty of excise, sales tax and other taxes if any payable on goods. Under S.18 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act , 1957 a registered dealer has to pay a tax known as "turnover tax" and by virtue of sub-s.(3) of S.18 he is not permitted to pass on that tax to the customer. The question is whether at the time of working out valuation of the goods, under the Central Excises and Salt Act , 1944, the turnover tax can be deducted. To be remembered that at this stage it will not have been actually paid.

3 The Tribunal has, in all these cases, held that so long as the tax is payable it can be deducted. We see no infirmity in this reasoning.

4 However, a clarification is sought from this Court as to whether ultimately the Department can ask for proof that the tax is actually paid. There is no dispute that the Department can always call for proof that the amount is ac


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top