Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
, J
Varadaraju v. State of Karnataka
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges trial court's rejection of in-camera proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on procedural application of s.327 concerning adequate space. (Para 3 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. arguments presented for and against open trial and in-camera proceedings. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. main question posed regarding the legality of the trial court's order. (Para 9) |
| 5. court allows revision petition and directs trial proceedings. (Para 11) |
1An unsuccessful petitioner - accused has come up with this petition, challenging the order dated 27-12-2004 in S. C. No. 64/2002, passed by the Fast Track Court - VIII, Sessions, Bangalore City.
2. The brief facts leading to the case are the petitioner has been charge - sheeted for offences punishable under S.376 and S.420 of the I. P. C. The trial of the case was expected to commence on 27-12-2004 and the trial was to be conducted in an in - camera form. At that time, the learned counsel for the petitioner - accused submitted before the Court below to conduct the trial in the Court hall itself in the form of in - camera, excluding the presence of unconcerned, as it is a normal procedure and it is not convenient to hold and conduct trial i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
