SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(SC) 56

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.K. SABHARWAL, CJ, C.K. THAKKER, J
Charutar Arogya Mandal v. Justice R. J. Shah (R) Fee Commtt. and Others


Table of Content
1. fee fixation process established by precedent. (Para 1)
2. opportunities for colleges and students for intervention. (Para 2)
3. conclusion of the appeal. (Para 3)

1. Leave granted. These matters relate to fee fixation in the medical and physiotherapy colleges. The question of fixation of fee now stands settled by judgment of this Court in P.A.Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra , 2005 (6) SCC 537 . In the light of the said judgment, the impugned judgment of the High Court cannot be sustained and the fee is required to be fixed by the Fee Fixation Committee having regard to the decision in P.A.Inamdar's case (supra). Accordingly, we set aside the impugned judgment and remit the matter relating to fee fixation for the Academic Years 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 to the Fee Fixation Committee for fresh fixation of fee in the light of the judgment in P.A.Inamdar's case.

3. The appeals are disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top