SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(SC) 209

SUPREME COURT
A. B. Chandrachud, J
Star India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sea T.V. Network Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction to the case and contractual agreements involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments related to regulatory concerns and appointments of distributors. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observations on discrimination and interpretation of regulatory standards. (Para 6 , 7)
4. summary of the court’s conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

1. Being aggrieved by the direction issued by the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal on 24.8.2005 ordering Star India Pvt. Ltd. appellant herein to supply signals of its bouquet of channels by entering into an Agreement with Sea T.V. Network Ltd. (respondent No.1 herein) on such terms and conditions which are not unreasonable, Star India Pvt. Ltd. has come to this Court byway of this civil appeal.

2. Star India Pvt. Ltd. is a company under the Companies Act, 1956. On 8.2.2005 Star India Pvt. Ltd. entered into Distributor Agreement with Moon Network Pvt. Ltd.(respondent No.2). M/s Moon Network Pvt. Ltd. under the Agreement was a distributor. Under the said Agreement there was a recital. Under that recital Star India Pvt. Ltd. had stated that it was an authorized distributor of the Satellite T.V. channels name







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top