SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Online)(SC) 70

SUPREME COURT
Altamas Kabir, *V. S. Sirpurkar, JJ.
J. K. Srivastava Group – Appellant
Versus
H. K. Srivastava Group – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of appeals leading to challenges against the clb's orders. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of consent and share valuation leading to ongoing disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 8)
3. declaration of remand directing fresh examination of management claims. (Para 21 , 22 , 24)

1. Leave granted.

3. The Company Law Board, on the basis of the aforementioned petition and the replies thereto by the respondents, was initially of the opinion that this being a family concern, the disputes should be resolved amicably and passed an order dated 22.1.1996 calling upon the parties to make efforts for compromise. The relevant extracts of the order are as under:
"In view of the close relationship between the parties, we suggested to the counsel for both the sides that they should try to work out an amicable settlement between the parties. The counsel have undertaken to do so. The result of their efforts will be intimated to us on 20th February 1996 at 2.30 p.m."
Thereafter, three hearings took place and ultimately on 7.5.1996, the CLB passed the following order:
"It was agreed by the parties that the petitioners will sell their shares to the respondents for a value per share to be determined




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top