SUPREME COURT
N/A, N/A
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Bal Mukund and Basanti Lal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's initial grievances regarding the high court judgment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of confessions and substance recovered. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. emergence of retracted confessions and lack of corroborative evidence. (Para 8 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. conclusion regarding procedural compliance and affirming acquittal. (Para 39 , 42) |
1. Union of India is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 13.05.2005 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Criminal Appeal Nos. 964 and 1108 of 2000.
2. The factual matrix involved herein is as under:
Sub Inspector Bajrang Lal posted in the Office of the Central Bureau of Narcotics, Ratlam purported to have obtained a secret information to the effect that the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein Bal Mukund and Basanti Lal would be carrying about 20 Kg. of Opium on the next day. A preventive party allegedly was formed pursuant to or in furtherance of the said information. At about 0430 hours on 21.06.1998, they reached Nayapura Phanta on Ratlam Jaora Road. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were seen carrying cement gunny bags. They were searched. 10 Kgs. of Opium packed in 5 polythene bag of 2 Kg. each from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.