SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1505

SUPREME COURT
Markandey Katju, A. K. Patnaik, JJ.
Thomas Gonsalves and Another v. Manohar Naik and Others
C. A. No. 5311 of 2005



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

The court established that earlier decisions are binding, confirming the applicability of prior rulings in evaluating present cases.

Headnote:This case involves an appeal set against a prior judgment by the High Court, based on the precedent established in Secretary, Malankara Syrian Catholic College Vs. T. Jose And Others (2007) 1 SCC 386. The court found that the current case's facts were adequately covered by the prior decision, leading to the overturning of the impugned judgment. The primary issue framed was whether the previous ruling was applicable, to which the court concluded affirmatively, allowing the appeal. Ultimately, the appeal was accepted, and the previous judgment was set aside.

Table of Content
1. heard arguments focusing on precedent. (Para 1 , 2)
2. overturned judgment based on applying previous case law. (Para 3 , 4)

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the facts of the present case are fully covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Secretary, Malankara Syrian Catholic College Vs. T. Jose And Others, 2007 (1) SCC 386 .

3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 fully agrees with the statement of learned counsel for the appellants.

4. Following the decision of this Court in the case of Secretary, Malankara Syrian Catholic College (supra), we set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 10.02.2004 of the High Court and allow this appeal. No order as to the costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top