SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(SC) 86

SUPREME COURT
R. V. Raveendran, R. M. Lodha, JJ.
Umesh Kumar Sinha v. State of Bihar and Others


Table of Content
1. proceedings initiated. (Para 1)
2. background of appellant's case. (Para 2 , 3)
3. review of pension rules. (Para 4 , 5)
4. disproportionate punishment. (Para 6)
5. reduction of gratuity penalty. (Para 7)

1. Leave granted. Heard the parties.

2. The appellant retired on 31-3-1998 while serving as the Managing Director of Bihar State Pharmaceutical and Chemical Development Corporation Ltd. (for short "the Corporation"). He was suspended pending inquiry and disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him, when he was in service. The disciplinary proceedings were continued after his retirement on 31-3-1998. The enquiry officer submitted a report holding that five out of the nine charges were proved. Thereafter, the disciplinary authority by order dated 1-10-2002 imposed the punishment of forfeiture of entire gratuity under R.43(b) of the Bihar Pension Rules ("the Rules", for short).

3. The appellant filed a writ petition praying that the said order dated 1-10-2002 be quashed. The writ petition was dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court on 23-5-2006. The letters patent appeal was also dismissed on 16-1-2007. The special leave petition filed by the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top